I have often noted that in Bridge a good defence to a method may be a variation ofitself! So it is with the "Multi". This page shows how to use "double as showing either major ..."
The idea is ascribed to Ed Sheldon, and the poster (Robin Michaels) had combined it with the Dutch method of transfer overcalls to allow exchange of strength information in minors too. A two-step transfer works best allowing both "come-on-baby" and 'drop dead' replies. This leaves 3/ free for preempts. Wicked! They say double showing either major had been seen before in UK's CUBC during the 80's.
The strong balanced hands? Well that spare 2 bid becomes a NT overcall allowing you to take out into a major below the level of the 2NT you might otherwise have used. With 19-21 we use a double first. 22 up might as well overcall 3NT. Solid minor hands could transfer first All these NT point ranges very approximate.
My own partnership has extended this slightly to make double a true Multi bid with further 19+ 4441 and strong balanced flavours. A big pay-off and source of fun is opponenents discomforture when you echo back their own options to them! Also it makes bidding further quite dangerous for them as all these hands can be strong defensively. This is mischief all quite legal! - "Any defence" is allowed in UK.
Unfortunately once we took it up the pesky opps stopped opening Multi's against us! This sort of complex system is a big tax on memory and so at present we have returned to standard issue UK Dixon
Multi v Multi method | |
Double = Multi with any of ...
2 or 2NT Transfers - opening bids in clubs or diamonds respectively 3 or 3 Pre-emptive! Less than an opening bid. How nice not to have to mix these in with the constructive! 3/ Michaels cue bids. 5-5 (rarely 5-4) Major-minor two suiter (NF) say 8 to 8½ tricks 3NT 22+ natural balanced |
Further bidding over (2) double = "Multi" | |
|
Further bidding over (2) 2 = strong NT | |
The main problem is you cannot play in 2NT - a similar situation to the Lebensohl system over 1NT (overcall)
|
Further bidding over (2) 2/2NT = transfers to minors | |
Next up relay showing values but may still pass 3/. Immediate transfer completion is weak. Otherwise natural |
Further bidding over 3/ = pre-empts | |
Natural - new suit strong and forcing. Raise preemptive. (We use next suit up as honour enquiry) |
Further bidding over (2) 3/ = "Michaels" | |
3NT is to play. 4/ seeking the minor ParadoXstyle Other major slammish asking for the minor |
Further bidding over (2) 3NT = 22+ balanced | |
Whatever you normally use. I like ..
4 = Stayman
4/ = transfers 4 = slammish in both minors |
Bids in 4th position | |
Standard - we use Dixon defence - Suit=natural Double of major=takeout 2NT=16-19 balanced |
Bids in 6th/8th position | |
Standard - but 6th is limited by not bidding before (but may have up to 18, unsuitable for immediate double) Double = takeout. 2NT=both minors 3/ natural with four in other major |
Correspondent Adam Wildavsky cites a simpler version from Michael Polowan ..
Although this is simple to remember it strikes me that a more natural Dixon like 2/ showing takeout of the other major carries less risk. The advantage of this treatment is that partner can count trumps in the major bid and make a judgement.
Links to my Main bridge homepage and chrisryall.net home page
www.chrisryall.net/bridge/multi-v-multi.htm © Chris Ryall 1987-2008
|